<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' version='2.0'><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15812141</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 20:11:55 +0000</lastBuildDate><title>GoogleFan</title><description></description><link>http://googlefan.com/news/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Rob)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>603</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15812141.post-8501864092442046437</guid><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 08:51:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-07-22T23:37:33.940+10:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Google Answers</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>goats</category><title>Goats</title><atom:summary type='text'>Anything to get in the news, this time Google have hired goats to mow their lawn. What next, bikini babes washing cars?</atom:summary><link>http://googlefan.com/news/2009/05/goats.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15812141.post-3735933187955027846</guid><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:37:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-07-09T04:43:21.541+10:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>gmail</category><title>Beta Label Lifted Finally</title><atom:summary type='text'>Citing it as a hindrance to corporate uptake, while not citing anything that has changed that makes any difference... Google has dropped the beta tag from Gmail, Calendar, Talk &amp; Docs.Showing they can still laugh at themselves, there is now a setting in Gmail that lets geeks restore the beta tag.</atom:summary><link>http://googlefan.com/news/2009/07/beta-label-lifted-finally.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15812141.post-5174355627400710679</guid><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 02:17:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-20T15:52:12.558+10:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>google groups</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>spam</category><title>Embarrassing Spam in Groups</title><atom:summary type='text'>I use Google Groups to follow discussions on the AdWords API, as do many other users of the API. For the last few days, every day, there have been 25 or so porn spam posts appearing. If it were a less serious group, maybe I'd have less reason to complain, but this is a discussion group hosted by a Google product, discussing a Google product, linked to from the official AdWords API blog, and all </atom:summary><link>http://googlefan.com/news/2009/04/embarrassing-spam-in-groups.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15812141.post-3212707299727004943</guid><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 01:38:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-03-23T12:41:50.024+11:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>privacy</category><title>What doesn't Google know about you?</title><atom:summary type='text'>Of course this only applies to those few who actually use Google's products, but I found it interesting that the blog post at e-Justice is titled 25 Surprising Things That Google Knows About You. It would be a much quicker read if they just called it Things That Google Doesn't Know About You (yet).</atom:summary><link>http://googlefan.com/news/2009/03/what-doesnt-google-know-about-you.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15812141.post-2510418005195927180</guid><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:10:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-03-05T23:24:40.921+11:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>maps</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>deer</category><title>Google Car Hits Deer</title><atom:summary type='text'>It is one thing to hit a wild animal in your car, but something else to leave an reminder of the accident in Google Maps for the world to see:More at The Guardian</atom:summary><link>http://googlefan.com/news/2009/03/google-car-hits-deer.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15812141.post-1998048110445038937</guid><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:16:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-02-25T07:50:53.508+11:00</atom:updated><title>Google Falling Apart?</title><atom:summary type='text'>Valentine's Day: AdWords reporting was down for 10 or 11 hours.Feb 18: Google News had a variety of problems resulting in messages of "Please try again shortly. We apologize that this section is currently unavailable."Has Google run out of space or bandwidth? Do they have a virus? Have they fired too many key staff? Are interns in charge?Hopefully these two outages in the space of a few days are </atom:summary><link>http://googlefan.com/news/2009/02/google-falling-apart.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15812141.post-975146641302833088</guid><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:02:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-02-13T20:07:21.710+11:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>hotmail</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>yahoo mail</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>gmail</category><title>Gmail to overtake Hotmail real soon</title><atom:summary type='text'>Here are the latest figures:Gmail 29.6 million  (unique visitors per month)Hotmail 43.5 millionYahoo 91 million However, Gmail has grown by 43% in the last year, whereas Hotmail have lost 5% of theirs. If that trend continues, Gmail will be the #2 provider in just over a year.Makes sense, it is by far the superior product.</atom:summary><link>http://googlefan.com/news/2009/02/gmail-to-overtake-hotmail-real-soon.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15812141.post-8982463686199021204</guid><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 09:20:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-02-04T20:26:45.066+11:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Google NewsShow</category><title>Add Google News to Your Site</title><atom:summary type='text'>Just released by Google, a simple way to present ad-free news headlines to your website.Get the code here:http://code.google.com/apis/ajaxsearch/documentation/newsshow/wizard.html</atom:summary><link>http://googlefan.com/news/2009/02/add-google-news-to-your-site.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15812141.post-6317046695795940512</guid><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:28:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-01-28T20:41:49.424+11:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>maps</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>images</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>satellite</category><title>Google's New Image Satellite</title><atom:summary type='text'>This is the first image from Google's brand new satellite, which promises to provide Google Maps with the highest resolution they can legally show us (higher resolutions will be sold to government agencies).</atom:summary><link>http://googlefan.com/news/2009/01/googles-new-image-satellite.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15812141.post-3782955603795149350</guid><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:50:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-01-24T11:34:31.649+11:00</atom:updated><title>The A to Z of Google Results</title><atom:summary type='text'>Search for a single letter in Google, and these sites come up first. The interesting results are in bold:a = Links in HTML documents from www.w3.org.b = Physical Review B from aps.org.c = C (programming language from wikipedia.org.d = Physical Review D from aps.org.e = E! Entertainment Onlinef = Ford Motor Company Stock from Yahoo! Finance.g = Gmail from Google.h = Hydrogen from wikipedia.org.i =</atom:summary><link>http://googlefan.com/news/2009/01/a-to-z-of-google-results.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15812141.post-1864910983269083928</guid><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 23:07:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-01-19T10:11:06.449+11:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>discontinued</category><title>Farewell to Six Google Products</title><atom:summary type='text'>Google has been doing this since the end of Google Answers - removing products that either lack popularity, didn't get to be fully developed, or lose money. Obviously this is a trade-off between pissing off the people that use it, and keeping their credibility intact, and pleasing shareholders.This week it was announced that these products are being discontinued, or no longer supported:    * </atom:summary><link>http://googlefan.com/news/2009/01/farewell-to-six-google-products.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15812141.post-1041449101623541286</guid><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 04:14:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-01-13T15:22:07.473+11:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>spam</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>gmail</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>hosting</category><title>Google Free Hosting Spam in Gmail</title><atom:summary type='text'>Watch out for this one, it ended up in my Gmail account, and I almost fell for it. As usual poor grammer is the giveaway. These phishers will have all you Google accounts if you sign in after following the link:Hello,Dear Gmail customerAfter our free email services we offer you to sing up for our free hosting services.This service currently is in beta test.And we choose you to test this services </atom:summary><link>http://googlefan.com/news/2009/01/google-free-hosting-spam-in-gmail.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15812141.post-2198206807973961355</guid><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 05:08:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-01-11T16:19:25.122+11:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>favicon</category><title>New Favicon for Google</title><atom:summary type='text'>You've undoubtedly already noticed it, but do you like it? I don't and I didn't like the last one either... but maybe it will grow on me.The original, and the last one:The new one:Read the full story straight from Marissa Mayer</atom:summary><link>http://googlefan.com/news/2009/01/new-favicon-for-google.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_7ZYqYi4xigk/SWfANhA5U9I/AAAAAAAACOM/-8e3TJyR0zA/s72-c/Google+Favicon_0109.png' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15812141.post-4380120767920902109</guid><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 10:18:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-12-12T21:23:32.021+11:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>popular</category><title>Top 40 Google Subdomains</title><atom:summary type='text'>According to Compete, Google.com gets 126 million unique visitors each month.Of Google's subdomains, images.google.com has 43 million, maps has 36 million, and mail has 24 million. The next most popular are video (surprisingly), books, picasa &amp; groups. To see the full list, pop over to Slackerology.</atom:summary><link>http://googlefan.com/news/2008/12/top-40-google-subdomains.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15812141.post-6100117079568788806</guid><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:47:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-11-21T07:50:42.448+11:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>news</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>finance</category><title>More Google Ads</title><atom:summary type='text'>This week ads appeared at Google Finance. They've been running video ads at YouTube for a short while. And now Google say that ads will soon appear on Google News. This has been put off for a long time, because of fear of being sued - basically the content is not theirs, so they shouldn't profit from it.Although these things were always going to come to pass, perhaps the slump in the GOOG price </atom:summary><link>http://googlefan.com/news/2008/11/more-google-ads.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15812141.post-696194207656718352</guid><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 22:06:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-10-30T16:35:04.544+11:00</atom:updated><title>Google Like It's 1999!</title><atom:summary type='text'>2001 actually. Google is letting us go back in time and do a search exactly how it would have been in 2001. If you had a #1 ranking back then, here's your chance to prove  it. For everyone else, look up something modern (like the iPhone) and see how it magically didn't exist back then, or perhaps meant something different that today.http://www.google.com/search2001.html</atom:summary><link>http://googlefan.com/news/2008/10/google-like-its-1999.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15812141.post-3678234354160733100</guid><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 03:25:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-10-08T14:29:51.570+11:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>gmail</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>drunk</category><title>No More Drunken Emails</title><atom:summary type='text'>The geniuses at Google have come up with an optional feature for Gmail - tell it when you are most likely to be drunk (ie Saturday night), and you will need to pass a sobriety test of sorts before you can send an email.I can imagine some folk getting very upset if they write a long email only to find they can't send it - perhaps have an option of quizzing you before you write it all... But then </atom:summary><link>http://googlefan.com/news/2008/10/no-more-drunken-emails.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15812141.post-6639390525724035023</guid><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 13:54:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-10-03T19:25:40.975+10:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>micronation</category><title>Google's Sea Nation</title><atom:summary type='text'>The news said:"The company is considering deploying the supercomputers necessary to operate its Internet search engines on barges anchored up to seven miles offshore."An alert person has picked up on the possibility of Google forming their own off-shore micronation:It's true! This is smart, using the ocean to cool their "supercomputers" and stuff. But! Hmm! Just seven miles offshore, you say? Now</atom:summary><link>http://googlefan.com/news/2008/10/googles-sea-nation.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15812141.post-2030999126075387300</guid><pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 23:59:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-09-22T10:04:06.043+10:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>blogger</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>sergey brin</category><title>Sergey Blogs</title><atom:summary type='text'>Google co-founder Sergey Brin has started writing a blog, and one presumes he will keep it up, so it might become an interesting read.His first post proper tells of how he is at risk of getting Parkinson's Disease, which nicely provides a plug for 23andMe, a genetic testing start-up firm co-founded by his wife and funded by Google.(The blog is called "Too" - and Sergey says that "this blog </atom:summary><link>http://googlefan.com/news/2008/09/sergey-blogs.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15812141.post-4221518432196236679</guid><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 09:40:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-09-11T19:46:04.572+10:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>sea</category><title>Aqua Google</title><atom:summary type='text'>Can't see it happening myself, can't see it being economically viable, but Google has filed a patent for placing server farms on barges in the ocean:The Google design incorporates the Pelamis Wave Energy Converter units, which use the motion of ocean surface waves to create electricity and can be combined to form "wave farms." The largest existing project uses seven Pelamis units to generate </atom:summary><link>http://googlefan.com/news/2008/09/aqua-google.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15812141.post-3226055228136065218</guid><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:18:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-08-13T10:24:02.328+10:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>gmail</category><title>Google Apologizes for GMail Downtime</title><atom:summary type='text'>It was only a 2 hour outage, but that's expensive for any business that depends on this service for their email. So Google have taken a rare (according to them) step of publicly apologizing.http://gmailblog.blogspot.com/2008/08/we-feel-your-pain-and-were-sorry.htmlWell, a public apology would be a press release, something Google are quite adept at utilising. But this apology merely appeared in </atom:summary><link>http://googlefan.com/news/2008/08/google-apologizes-for-gmail-downtime.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15812141.post-6805840147153610638</guid><pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 23:52:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-08-05T10:10:18.395+10:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>street view</category><title>Street View Australia Launched</title><atom:summary type='text'>You can see it here:http://maps.google.com.au/help/maps/streetview/All capital cities, most coastal cities and many regional &amp; outback towns are covered but there are a few notable omissions, like Uluru. My home is there, and it works well.There are still privacy concerns, but these have been lessened following the introduction of technology that can blur faces and number plates.</atom:summary><link>http://googlefan.com/news/2008/08/street-view-australia-launched.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15812141.post-8308380224531926266</guid><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:14:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-07-18T08:17:00.716+10:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>hubris</category><title>If Google Ruled the World</title><atom:summary type='text'>More of these can be found at a post on 2012 Forum.</atom:summary><link>http://googlefan.com/news/2008/07/if-google-ruled-world.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15812141.post-2394343872218132553</guid><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 23:40:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-07-14T09:53:48.644+10:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>swastika</category><title>Swastika Tops Google Hot Trends</title><atom:summary type='text'>A new method for gaming Google results has emerged. At some point on Thursday, a member of 4chan's "b" channel posted a simple two-part instruction. First, Google "&amp;#21328;". Second, enjoy.This had the double effect of getting the search query into Hot Trends, and also showing a symbol instead of words. Very clever indeed.While not having the same long-term implications of Google bombing - which </atom:summary><link>http://googlefan.com/news/2008/07/swastika-tops-google-hot-trends.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15812141.post-6625630047077878750</guid><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 03:05:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-07-07T13:53:44.435+10:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>ebay</category><title>Anti-eBay Anonymous Submission Not Anon Enough</title><atom:summary type='text'>Not too long after attacking eBay in public, Google have done it again, hoping to be anonymous, but actually not:...one 38 page document that is squarely opposed to the actions of eBay was filed anonymously. Unfortunately for Google, David Bromage was smart enough to look through the document’s meta data. He found that the title of the original document[pdf] was “Microsoft Word - 204481916_1_ACCC</atom:summary><link>http://googlefan.com/news/2008/07/anti-ebay-anonymous-submission-not-anon.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Rob)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item></channel></rss>